In May, Timur Vafin, Marcel Goerner, and Eugene Bolshakov helped make Clearance i18n-aware.
Even if your language is English, this means you can control all of Clearance’s flash keys and email subjects from one YAML file.
Pretty sweet! Thanks for the patches, fellas.
en:
flashes:
failure_when_forbidden:
'Please double check the URL or try submitting the form again.'
failure_after_update:
"Password can't be blank."
failure_after_create:
'Bad email or password. Are you trying to register a new account?
<a href="%{sign_up_path}">Sign up</a>.'
helpers:
submit:
password:
submit:
'Reset password'
password_reset:
submit:
'Save this password'
session:
submit:
'Sign in'
user:
create:
'Sign up'
label:
password:
email:
'Email address'
password_reset:
password:
'Choose password'
layouts:
application:
sign_in:
'Sign in'
sign_out:
'Sign out'
passwords:
create:
description:
'You will receive an email within the next few minutes.
It contains instructions for changing your password.'
edit:
title:
'Change your password'
description:
'Your password has been reset. Choose a new password below.'
new:
title:
'Reset your password'
description:
'To be emailed a link to reset your password, please enter your email
address.'
sessions:
new:
title:
'Sign in'
sign_up:
'Sign up'
forgot_password:
'Forgot password?'
users:
new:
sign_in:
'Sign in'
clearance_mailer:
change_password:
beginning_paragraph:
'Someone, hopefully you, requested we send you a link to change your
password:'
ending_paragraph:
"If you didn't request this, ignore this email. Your password hasn't
been changed."
Written by Dan Croak.
What is your Ubiquitous Language for authentication?
Common language includes “logging in”, “registering”, “joining up”, “creating an account”, “signing up”, and “signing out.”
Do you interchange these words in your UI? How about in your application code? Tests? Does your whole team use the same language across all layers of the software?
When writing a library like Clearance, I feel the authors should take a stand on language to alleviate the mental burden on designers, developers, and business analysts involved in the project.
The decision is basically arbitrary. No one set of terms is better than the other. What’s important is to take the opportunity to standardize all the places this shows up in code.
So we picked “sign up”, “sign in”, and “sign out”, a lingual trinity of authentication.
We liked the symmetry. We liked that there was less of a chance of writing “log in” (sounds like a verb) or “log_in” in certain places and “login” (sounds like a noun) other places.
About a half a year later and we still feel good about the effect.
context 'when signed out' do
context 'on get to new' do
setup do
get :new
end
should_deny_access
end
end
context 'when signed in' do
setup do
sign_in
end
context 'on get to new' do
setup do
get :new
end
...
end
end
context 'when signed in as an admin' do
setup do
sign_in_as create(:admin)
end
context 'on delete to destroy' do
setup do
delete :destroy
end
...
end
end
class UsersController < Clearance::UsersController
def create
...
sign_in(@user)
end
end
class ParticipationsController < ApplicationController
private
def ensure_signed_in
unless signed_in?
store_location
flash[:failure] = 'Please sign in to participate in this deal.'
redirect_to sign_in_path
end
end
end
module NavigationHelper
def authentication_links
if signed_in?
signed_in_links
else
signed_out_links
end
end
def signed_out_links
[
link_to('Sign up', sign_up_path),
link_to('Sign in', sign_in_path)
]
end
def signed_in_links
[
link_to('My Account', edit_user_path(current_user)),
link_to('Sign out', sign_out_path)
]
end
end
For something as common as authentication, familiarity for users breeds comfort. So what do the others do?
Basecamp is a little inconsistent, mixing sign in with login:


Apple is pretty as usual:

Google is perfectly consistent. Youtube and Gmail:



Sweet, sweet consistency.
Written by Dan Croak.
Authentication is a common pattern in Rails apps. Thus, there have been many authentication plugins. We’ve tried acts_as_authenticated and restful_authentication over the years.
We found that user authentication is hard to generalize. Most abstracted authentication plugins had both too much and too little for us.
We then tried writing authentication from scratch on our clients’ Rails apps for about a year. We felt better about test coverage but it was still a pain to re-write similar code. App after app, we talked about extracting common code into a library. Each time we resisted.
After a while, we thought that maybe 60% of authentication could be re-used. We extracted Hoptoad’s authentication, then merged code from two of our clients’ apps. We named the gem Clearance.
On the first attempt, we went overboard on re-use. We backed off and wrote hooks in places we were finding logical extension points. For the past few months, patches have trickled in from Github and we’ve carefully included code that fits in the “60%”.
We recently started a new project. In the process, we’ve polished the gem and are happy to announce its official release.
Get it on Github.
Clearance is focused on maintainability of your application’s authentication code.
This approach keeps your Rails application’s code clean and alerts you if you ever break your authentication code.
Due to the work we’ve been doing to make Shoulda test framework-agnostic, you will be able to use RSpec in the 0.5.0 release of Clearance.
Test::Unit and Cucumber features are also supported:
script/generate clearance
script/generate clearance_features
To keep our approach simple, we made a series of design decisions:
Clearance does not try to be a Swiss Army knife but it does have some hooks if you want admin roles, sign up and sign in by username in addition to email, or something else.
Please report bugs and request features on GitHub Issues.
Written by Dan Croak.